A complete teaching workflow

Build exam-prep courses around diagnostics, practice, and feedback

Create an exam system that starts with evidence, maps skills, mixes practice, reviews mock tests, and stays maintainable when an exam changes.

SubSchool
A complete teaching workflow

Skill map

ContextBaseline
Teacher controlFeedback + progressReady for review
How it works in SubSchool

Each step stays editable, visible, and connected

These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.

  1. Step 01

    Baseline

    Map current domains, question types, timing, scoring, allowed tools, accommodations, and source-update dates before creating content.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    source

    Baseline

    DescriptionBook or PDFVideos
    Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording
  2. Step 02

    Skill map

    Use a baseline and error log to distinguish knowledge gaps, process errors, timing, confidence, and careless mistakes.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    course

    Skill map

    AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidence
    Module 1Frame the decision3 lessons
    Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons
    Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons
  3. Step 03

    Targeted practice

    Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    practice

    Targeted practice

    Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks
    01
    Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 points
    Included
    02
    Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 points
    Included
    03
    Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 points
    Review
  4. Step 04

    Mixed practice

    Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    practice

    Mixed practice

    Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks
    01
    Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 points
    Included
    02
    Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 points
    Included
    03
    Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 points
    Review
  5. Step 05

    Mock test

    Explain the evidence, sample size, remaining weaknesses, and next plan rather than promising a score from a thin signal.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    review

    Mock test

    AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review
    • Uses evidence4 / 5
    • Explains limitations5 / 5
    • Recommendation clarity3 / 5
    Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation.
  6. Step 06

    Feedback + progress

    The teacher compares the first pass with the original work, changes the score where needed, writes final feedback, and decides what the learner receives.

    SubSchool teacher workspaceDraft saved
    review

    Feedback + progress

    AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review
    • Uses evidence4 / 5
    • Explains limitations5 / 5
    • Recommendation clarity3 / 5
    Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation.
01

Start with an official exam specification

Map current domains, question types, timing, scoring, allowed tools, accommodations, and source-update dates before creating content.

02

Diagnose before assigning volume

Use a baseline and error log to distinguish knowledge gaps, process errors, timing, confidence, and careless mistakes.

03

Create original, maintainable practice

Ground instruction in official guidance while respecting copyright and marking any uncertain or changing rule for review.

04

Connect feedback to the next set

Use criterion-level evidence and recurring errors to choose targeted practice, then return to mixed conditions.

05

Report progress without false certainty

Explain the evidence, sample size, remaining weaknesses, and next plan rather than promising a score from a thin signal.

Questions and limits

Common questions

Who is the exam prep course workflow designed for?

Create an exam system that starts with evidence, maps skills, mixes practice, reviews mock tests, and stays maintainable when an exam changes. Map current domains, question types, timing, scoring, allowed tools, accommodations, and source-update dates before creating content.

What problem does the exam prep course workflow solve?

Create an exam system that starts with evidence, maps skills, mixes practice, reviews mock tests, and stays maintainable when an exam changes. Use a baseline and error log to distinguish knowledge gaps, process errors, timing, confidence, and careless mistakes.

What happens between baseline and feedback + progress?

The connected steps are Baseline → Skill map → Targeted practice → Mixed practice → Mock test → Feedback + progress. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.

Can I reuse existing material in the exam prep course workflow?

Map current domains, question types, timing, scoring, allowed tools, accommodations, and source-update dates before creating content. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.

Can teachers edit skill map before students see it?

Use a baseline and error log to distinguish knowledge gaps, process errors, timing, confidence, and careless mistakes. Generated modules, lessons, exercises, criteria, scores, and feedback are saved as editable product objects rather than a block of text to copy elsewhere.

Does the exam prep course workflow include human review?

Ground instruction in official guidance while respecting copyright and marking any uncertain or changing rule for review. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.

Can I test the exam prep course workflow with a private draft first?

Use criterion-level evidence and recurring errors to choose targeted practice, then return to mixed conditions. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.

Continue in SubSchool

Turn the page into a real teaching workflow

Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.

Build an exam-prep course