Train people and evaluate real work—not just video completion
Turn approved internal material into courses, add role-based written, presentation, and interview assignments, and use structured first-pass assessment with accountable human review.
Review evidence from real work
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the relevant account actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Approved sources
Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.
Private training pilotApproved sources
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review - Step 02
Editable training
Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.
Private training pilotEditable training
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review - Step 03
Role task
AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision.
Private training pilotRole task
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review - Step 04
Evidence
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
Private training pilotEvidence
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review - Step 05
Human review
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
Private training pilotHuman review
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review - Step 06
Programme update
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
Private training pilotProgramme update
Private courseCustomer-support onboarding 6 lessons · role-based scenarios
PilotHuman reviewWritten escalation response Original answer and criterion scores
Needs review
Turn internal knowledge into a maintainable programme
Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.
Ask for evidence of performance
Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.
Keep managers responsible for high-stakes decisions
AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision.
Pilot one workflow before scaling
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
Common questions
Is SubSchool a full enterprise LMS or HR system?
No. The supported business use case is a focused private-training pilot with editable courses, assignments, learner evidence, and human-reviewed assessment.
What kinds of work can a training assignment collect?
Supported tasks can collect written responses, presentations, spoken interviews, photos, and other files relevant to the role.
Does AI make employment or high-stakes decisions?
No. AI can produce a criterion-level first pass. An accountable person reviews the original response, changes supported scores, and makes the final decision.
How should a team start?
Start with one approved training programme and a defined human-review workflow, then compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.
