Train people and evaluate real work—not just video completion
Turn approved internal material into courses, add role-based written, presentation, and interview assignments, and use structured first-pass assessment with accountable human review.
Editable training
Each step stays editable, visible, and connected
These product views use example data to show what the teacher actually sees—not an abstract feature diagram.
- Step 01
Approved sources
Choose the description, approved document, recording, or existing lesson that should ground the result. The source stays visible while the draft is reviewed.
sourceApproved sources
DescriptionBook or PDFVideos＋Add approved source materialPDF, DOCX, video or lesson recording - Step 02
Editable training
Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.
courseEditable training
AI & PRODUCTDecision-making with evidenceModule 1Frame the decision3 lessons Module 2Collect useful evidence4 lessons Module 3Test the recommendation3 lessons - Step 03
Role task
Build an editable exercise pool from the actual lesson context, then select the tasks, response formats, difficulty, and points that fit this learner.
practiceRole task
Lesson contextInterview evidence and decision risks01 Explain your recommendationExtended answer · 10 pointsIncluded02 Prioritise the evidence gapsScenario · 8 pointsIncluded03 Record a two-minute defenceSpoken response · 12 pointsReview - Step 04
Evidence
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
responseEvidence
AssignmentDefend the decision and name the largest uncertainty.▶02:14Student response“The strongest evidence supports option B, but the sample is still too narrow…”
Transcript ready - Step 05
Human review
Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.
reviewHuman review
AI first pass84%Ready for teacher review- Uses evidence4 / 5
- Explains limitations5 / 5
- Recommendation clarity3 / 5
Teacher feedbackGood reasoning. Add one piece of evidence that could disprove your recommendation. - Step 06
Programme update
Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.
liveProgramme update
Tue2814:00Live tutoring sessionEvidence review with AnnaRecording · notes · follow-up homework TeacherAnna S.Ben L.Join lesson
Turn internal knowledge into a maintainable programme
Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.
Ask for evidence of performance
Use scenarios, essays, presentations, interviews, and other role-relevant outputs instead of treating completion as proof of competence.
Keep managers responsible for high-stakes decisions
AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision.
Pilot one workflow before scaling
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding.
Common questions
How does SubSchool for business help with everyday teaching or learning?
Turn approved internal material into courses, add role-based written, presentation, and interview assignments, and use structured first-pass assessment with accountable human review. Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible.
What can I set up first in SubSchool for business?
The connected steps are Approved sources → Editable training → Role task → Evidence → Human review → Programme update. Each result remains inside SubSchool, where the teacher can inspect and edit it before the next step.
Can I bring existing courses, lessons, or recordings into SubSchool for business?
Structure approved documents, recordings, and expert material as editable modules, lessons, objectives, and practice while keeping source ownership visible. Only use source material you are authorised to process, and remove unnecessary personal or sensitive information.
How does AI assessment work in SubSchool for business?
AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision. AI can prepare or assess a first pass, but the educator controls source material, assignment, publication, the final score, and student-facing feedback.
Can courses and student work stay private in SubSchool for business?
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding. You can keep work private as a draft, test the complete flow with example data, and publish or assign it only after review.
Does SubSchool for business support tutoring as well as courses?
AI can prepare a criterion-level first pass. The accountable reviewer inspects the original submission, changes the score, and makes the final decision. Live lessons, recordings, follow-up practice, feedback, and learner progress can stay in the same connected workflow.
How do payments and access work in SubSchool for business?
Compare reviewer agreement, learner performance, preparation time, and operational load on one real programme before expanding. Educators can choose public or private access and decide whether learners buy a full course, a smaller learning unit, or join through their school.
Turn the page into a real teaching workflow
Keep the result editable, connect it to learners, and preserve teacher review.